Print Page - _tprintf difference using

Title: _tprintf difference using _UNICODE
Post by: iancasey on February 14, 2008, 11:53:09 PM

Hi,
I think I may have found a bug in _tprintf and Unicode

_tprintf("%s%s%s\n",_T("This Took : "), _T("50"), _T(" secs."));
_tprintf(_T("This Took : 99 secs."));

under
pocc -W1 -Ot -Gd -Go -MT -Ze -Zx -Tx86-coff -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0400 -DUNICODE -D_UNICODE test.c

the 1st line only produces only the 1st character
2nd line emits the whole line

without -DUNICODE -D_UNICODE in the compile line, then both lines produce the desired results.

Ian

Title: Re: _tprintf difference using _UNICODE
Post by: JohnF on February 15, 2008, 08:28:56 AM

When using UNICODE you need to have %ls format specifier.

John

Title: Re: _tprintf difference using _UNICODE
Post by: iancasey on February 15, 2008, 07:06:07 PM

Thanks John,
It worked of course.
I've been using PellesC for PPC for 2-3 years and never noticed a difference using the format specifier before.
I am learning there are slight differences between PPC unicode and the desktop version.

Great work Pelles on version 5.00

Regards,
Ian

Pelles C forum

Pelles C => Bug reports => Topic started by: iancasey on February 14, 2008, 11:53:09 PM