Version 9.00 (RC1) is now available

[Pelle]

Pelles C version 9.00 (RC1) is now available for download:
http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

Major changes:
http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/changes_800_900.htm

/Pelle

[Robert]

Hi Pelle:

Thank you for 9.00 RC1.

I would like to suggest that it be mentioned in your announcement that the Addin SDK is now consolidated, as an option, with the main setup.

[Pelle]

Thank you. Good point, I will add something about the Add-In SDK...

[TimoVJL]

Thanks for this release

Release/Debug ComboBox positioned over Add-In toolbar buttons

Is this feature too hard to develop?

Code: [Select]

...
!if "$(POC_PROJECT_MODE)" == "Release"
OUTPUT = output#
POC_PROJECT_OUTPUTDIR = $(OUTPUT)#
...
!elseif "$(POC_PROJECT_MODE)" == "Debug"
OUTPUT = outdbg#
POC_PROJECT_OUTPUTDIR = $(OUTPUT)#
...
hello.exe: \
$(OUTPUT)\hello.obj
$(LINK) $(LINKFLAGS) -out:"$@" $**

$(OUTPUT)\hello.obj: \
hello.c
$(CC) $(CCFLAGS) "$!" -Fo"$@"


[jj2007]

Thumbs up, Pelle 

It seems you added also some warnings (and rightly so).

[Pelle]

Thank tou.

TimoVJL:
"Release/Debug ComboBox positioned over Add-In toolbar buttons"
OK. Fixed for the next upload.

"Is this feature too hard to develop?"
I have thought about this. This change shouldn't be that hard, but it leads to other changes and (more importantly) other problems. I really don't want to mess with this right now.

jj2007:
"It seems you added also some warnings..."
Yes. The problem is always to identify things to warn about without producing (too many) false positives...

[akee]

Cool! Thanks Pelle...

[ika]

It's great seeing that you are still working on this. Great stuff!

I am just confused about what you mean by C17 standard in the change notes. If I look on the standards website: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/  It doesn't mention a C17 standard. Does this mean that Pelles C was updated to implement the newest technical reports?

[Pelle]

It's great seeing that you are still working on this. Great stuff!

Thanks!

I am just confused about what you mean by C17 standard in the change notes. If I look on the standards website: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/  It doesn't mention a C17 standard. Does this mean that Pelles C was updated to implement the newest technical reports?

see this blog: https://gustedt.wordpress.com, especially the post from April 17, 2018.
I made a small gamble that the tentative schedule isn't too far off (publishing June or July 2018), but the ISO wheels turns slowly, so who knows?
At the moment Pelles C is at the "release candidate stage", so there is still time...

[ika]

see this blog: https://gustedt.wordpress.com, especially the post from April 17, 2018.
I made a small gamble that the tentative schedule isn't too far off (publishing June or July 2018), but the ISO wheels turns slowly, so who knows?
At the moment Pelles C is at the "release candidate stage", so there is still time...

Now I understand what you meant. 

It's impressive to see this level of standards support- I have always appreciated this about your compiler.

[frankie]

Sorry for the delay, I've been very busy in the last time 
Welcome back Pelle   
I'll have a look to the new version in next days.

[Pelle]

Welcome back yourself...