News:

Download Pelles C here: http://www.pellesc.se

Main Menu

Offline GitHub MS Documents

Started by John Z, November 09, 2025, 05:21:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

John Z

Attached is the full release for the access program for the win32-docs.zip downloaded from GitHub:
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/win32

This provides a way to use and access documentation (mainly the API Names) from the GitHub documentation effort off-line, and searchable.

The documents can be viewed in the .md format or in a .html format.  Searching is provided in the .md display, and of course intrinsically in the web browser viewing .html.

TimoVJL provided the code/method to search the win32 documentation for API NAMES from which I created a database and the rest of the program.  See readme_v4.txt, for other external source code attributions.

It is possible that the MD_Files_3.db3 could be expanded in the future to include all topics in the win32-docs.zip and that would not require changing the basic program to be immediately useful.  TBD

John Z

TimoVJL

Sadly win32-docs have still a some problems and updates sometimes make more of them.

MS should make a checking code with or without AI.
MSDN xhtml isn't perfect for offline usage, as every documentations groups do things in their own way, so it is very messy for parsing.

Something went very wrong near year 2012.
May the source be with you

John Z

I'm sure you are right based on prior findings. In the last 15 months it has only grown about 7Meg.

Not sure I want to reprocess it to update the MD_Files_3.db3 and MDFiles.exe I created for easily accessing the data...

Documentation access utilities like Hint, Hint_SA, MDFiles, don't see much interest by forum members.  I might post Hint_SA on SourceForge with links back to Pelles Forum if someone wants the GPL'ed source code that is required to be provided.

John Z

P.S. There is not a 'bot'/'AI' excluded Open Source License yet either . . . theoretically a 'bot'/'AI' could request the source code from any GPL'ed project and the developer would be obligated to provide it.
 
I guess anything on GitHub/GitLab has already been absorbed