priority of operations

[vedro-compota]

Ah ... I understand you completely. "priority" does not relevant to the problem -  as it had been said ... - as frankie said  =

This is not a problem of priorities

[CommonTater]

[CommonTater , I  got this problem from practise had quickly solved it by replacing 

Code: [Select]

str++; next= str; by

Code: [Select]

next= str++and only after that I asked why

Code: [Select]

next= str++ "doesn't work" ))

More exactly ... it did work, it just didn't do what you expected.
 
 

[vedro-compota]

one more my mistake (due to carelessness - during post typing).... -
replacing

Code: [Select]

next= str++by

Code: [Select]

str++; next= str; // actually i needed firstly incremented str

[CommonTater]

one more my mistake.... -
replacing
Code: [Select]

str++; next= str;
next= str++
by
str++; next= str; // actually i needed firstly incremented

Then you could have used....

Code: [Select]

next  = ++str;   


[vedro-compota]

one more my mistake (due to carelessness - during post typing).... -
replacing

Code: [Select]

next= str++by

Code: [Select]

str++; next= str; // actually i needed firstly incremented str
yes - next  = ++str;  is alternative)
I've understand this  from your first answer in this thread))